CLVPartners

labour law

Possibilities to support the employee’s studies

It is often that workers educate themselves alongside their employment, whether or not related to their job. Employers tend to support employees in continuing their education, as a broader-minded workforce is also more valuable to them. The question often arises as to how and in what ways employers can support employees to continue their studies. Below we present practical solutions to this issue.

Study contract

The most common is that, under a study contract, the employer provides certain support for the training, while the employee undertakes to continue his studies and obtain a qualification and not to terminate his employment by notice for a certain period of time afterwards.

Subject of the study contract

A study contract may not be concluded for training if the employer ordered the employee to compete it. Except this case, however, it may cover any in-school or non-school training or education. The parties may also conclude an agreement on the acquisition of qualification or the achievement of a specific academic result or average.

Duration of the agreement

According to the legislation, the worker may not terminate his employment contract by giving notice within a period proportional to the amount of the support, but not exceeding five years after the end of the studies. The duration must be proportional not to the length of the training but to the amount of the employer’s support. In other words, the purpose of the employee’s “restriction” is to recoup the employer’s support through the employee’s employment for a specified period. A disproportionately long restriction may result invalidity of the contract.

The form of the support

The form of support provided by the employer in respect of the studies is typically the payment of all or part of the training fees. In addition, or in parallel, support may of course include the purchase of study materials, the payment of travel/accommodation costs, or the employer may ensure the attendance of the employee at training and exams, which typically take place during or affecting working hours. Indeed, support may be provided if the employer grants extra day(s) off for the preparation time necessary for the exams.

Exemption from contractual obligations

It is important to emphasize that the obligation arising from the study contract only applies to the normal termination of the employee, so if the conditions are met, the employee can terminate his employment with immediate effect. In addition, the law also states that the employee is exempted from his obligations if the employer commits a serious breach of contract (e.g.: fails to provide the study support he has undertaken to provide).

The employer also has the right of withdrawal and reclaim if the employee breaches the provisions applicable to him or if the employer terminates the employment relationship on the basis of the employee’s behaviour.

Another important point to note is that if there is a material change in the circumstances of the parties which would make performance impossible or result in unreasonable hardship, the party concerned has the right to terminate the contract with immediate effect.

Other agreements

In reality, the parties may not always wish to enter into a study contract with each other, and there may even be situations where it is not practical or reasonable.

An example is when the employer does not provide financial support but only allows the employee to attend classes or to take a few extra days off. In such a case, the employee’s restriction would only be enforceable for a period equivalent to the leave, in view of the requirement of proportionality, which is hardly realistic. In such cases, it is suggested that the parties consider other arrangements. As to the previous example, an alternative solution could be for the parties to agree on (unpaid) leave for the days of the exams or to (mutually) extend the notice period for a fixed period.

Possibilities to support the employee’s studies Read More »

Incentive schemes for blue-collar workers

 

INCENTIVE SCHEMES FOR BLUE-COLLAR WORKERS

The increased demand for labour, the emigration of skilled manual workers – either to a company in a neighbouring city or across the border – places a significant burden on companies’ HR colleagues. There is a recurring need to develop appropriate incentive schemes that increase the appreciation of high performing colleagues and help retain employees.

According to our experience, a compensation system will only be viable, if it is based on well estimated employee needs and a comprehensive knowledge of the options available under labour law. In this article, we would like to draw attention to solutions that go beyond the (also significant) remuneration policy.

Wages and Compensation

 The most trivial correlation is that if an employee earns more, he/she is more likely to stay with the company. In our experience, a proper salary model is undoubtedly an important tool, but not the only one, as employees already take into account other incentives in addition to their wages, which are effective if the conditions are tailored to the employer and the job and diversified according to e.g. presence, performance, quality. The social needs of employees (e.g., tax-free allowances, holiday allowances, etc.) are increasingly important. Employers must be very precise and accurate in defining compensation to avoid labour law and tax risks, for example the classification of compensation as wage, which can lead to serious tax payments and penalties later.

Transparency

 It is important that the employees understand the benefit and that compensation was objective. If, for example, an allowance is based on the company’s results, it must be comprehensible to all employees concerned without the need to read the company accounts. A transparent system leads to greater employee loyalty and increases trust in the employer.

Transparency is often used as a synonym of objectivity at companies, even though the two terms do not have the same meaning. Objective and subjective benefits differ as in the latter case the employer has at least some discretion over the actual payments. However, it is important for both systems to be drafted in a clear and comprehensive way – in our view, this is in the interest of both parties. An example is the combination of group and individual bonuses in the case of a manufacturing company. A dual bonus system ensures that employees not focus only on their own performance, but also on the performance of the team as a whole – that results in making them better off financially, but also in achieving other HR policy objectives (cohesion, team spirit, loyalty).

Predictability

A principle that makes a reward system successful and is closely linked to transparency is predictability. For blue-collar workers, it is of major importance that their livelihood is secure not only immediately, but also in the distant future. It is therefore worthwhile to set short- and medium-term goals in a structured way.

Communication

Entities very often ignore the importance of communication. Whether we are talking about verbal feedback or incentive schemes, positive feedback is much more effective than punitive – disincentive – regulation. In case of physical workers, it is equally important that the company’s core values are expressed to them properly (also in the daily cooperation), and that they can expect the same from the coworkers. It is pointless to proclaim that an employer protects personal rights if it monitors premises illegally. However, it is also important to be aware of the legal aspects of the timing and content of communications, as in many cases these qualify as binding commitments to the employer for the future.

Opportunity for promotion

Ambitious and talented employees should be constantly monitored and provided with the opportunity for development, promotion or training. That will help to retain the most loyal people in the long term. For employers, however, it is of paramount importance to include appropriate labour law guarantees in the agreement with such employees.

As a conclusion, Hungarian labour law provides a very wide range of incentives for blue-collar workers, which not only provide additional benefits for employees, but can also guarantee companies the retention of a secure workforce. However, knowledge and understanding of the basic challenges and the most optimal labour law and tax aspects of possible HR solutions are essential for successful implementation.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, feel free to contact us.

CLVPartners contact us

Incentive schemes for blue-collar workers Read More »

The Final Teleworking Rules – Home Office

We are pleased to inform you that on 17 December 2021 the new regulations were adopted regarding the teleworking – home office – labour law and the related occupational safety and health and tax rules.

The good news is that the final regulation repeated without any change the rules was introduced on 3 July 2021 in the Decree No. 487/2020 of 11 November 2020 (“Summer Rules”). At that time, it was uncertain if the Summer Rules would survive the end of the state of emergency.
Just remind you, the Summer Decree extended the definition of teleworking to the employees who work from their home in 2/3rd or more of their annual working hours and perform their works via IT system.

In addition, the employers might apply different occupational safety and health rules regarding such remote workers, as the employer was obliged to inform the employee about the safety requirements, and the employees were liable for selecting a working pace that is compliant with the requirements disclosed by the employer.
The employers may provide their employees with tax-free allowances for teleworking up to 10% of the monthly minimum wage.

The new rules incorporate all the transitional provisions of the Summer Rules on teleworking into the relevant Acts concerned Act I of 2012 on the Labour Code, Act XCIII of 1993 on Labour Protection, Act CXVII of 1995 on Personal Income Tax), and become part of the legal system and will remain with us in the long term.

The new legislation is particularly important as it mitigates the uncertainty whether the employment contracts already amended and made compliant with the Summer Decree should be amended again once the state of emergency situation has ceased to exist and another rules would be introduced.

The good news for those who have already implemented the teleworking Summer Rules and amended the employment contract accordingly, there is nothing to be done neither now nor when the new regulations enter into force.

For those who have not yet taken advantage of the possibility offered by the Summer Rules, we recommend using the time for implementing the rules until the new statutory rules enters into force the at the end of the emergency, which is unknown future date.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, feel free to contact us.

 CLVPartners news

 

The Final Teleworking Rules – Home Office Read More »

Exemption from work during adoption

Pursuant to the amendments of Act I of 2012 on the Labour Code (“Labour Code”) effective as of 1st September 2020, the employee shall be exempted from the requirement of availability and from work for a maximum of 10 working days per year during the period of preparation for adoption.

The pre-adoption phase provides an opportunity for parents intending to adopt and the child to be adopted to meet, introduce themselves and start to get to know each other before the adoption. Also during this period, the living conditions of the parents wishing to adopt will be assessed, counseling will be provided by the child protection service and, if required, a free adoption course will be conducted.
As the procedure involves a number of tasks for the employee, the legislator considered it necessary to exempt the employee from his/her requirement of availability and work during this period.

The exemption is available to both prospective parents, who are entitled to an absence fee for this period. The exemption shall also apply in the case of an executive employee, from which the employment agreement of the executive employee may not deviate.

The conditions for claiming the exemption are defined by the Labour Code as follows:
– exemption from availability and work is possible on the basis of a certificate issued by the adoption organization;
– the employee may claim the exemption within 90 days following the issuance of the certificate;
– the employee shall inform his/her employer at least 5 working days in advance of his/her intention to claim the exemption;
the employee must be exempted on the dates specified in his/her request, therefore it is up to the employee to determine the dates;
– the Labour Code does not stipulate that the exemption of 10 working days should be granted to the employee only continuously, therefore the employee may request that the exemption be granted in several installments within 90 days from the issuance of the above-mentioned certificate.

If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact us.

Exemption from work during adoption Read More »

Wage Aid Provided For Reduced Working Hours Changed

On 29 April 2020, beneficial changes enter into effect in the aid provided for reduced working time employment.
The wage subsidy may be requested if the reduced working time reaches at least 25% and at most 85% of the previous working time, and no longer has to reach 4 hours a day.

The amount of the maximum wage subsidy depends partly on the lost working time and partly on twice the net minimum wage, therefore the maximum wage subsidy available increased to HUF 112,350 according to the decree, contrary to statements made in the media, according to which the maximum amount remains unchanged.

Further good news is that there will be less administration, an agreement on the incomprehensible individual development time is only mandatory if the reduced working hours exceed half of the previous working hours, and wage subsidies may now be granted for home office work, remote work, temporary agency work and during the working time frame.

Headcount maintenance and not ordering extraordinary working hours (overtime) will only apply to employees receiving the wage subsidy.

Unfortunately, the most uncertain circumstance has not been removed from the requirements, as employers still have to credibly prove the undefined ‘interest of national economy’ to retain employees.

Wage Aid Provided For Reduced Working Hours Changed Read More »

Derogations in the application of Labour Code for the duration of state of emergency

Effective as of today (19 March 2020) until 30 days after the end of state of emergency, the Labour Code shall be applied with derogations as a part of the economic measures announced yesterday. Please see our brief summary as follows:
1. Derogations to be applied unilaterally by the employer:

a) employer may also amend the announced work time schedule within 96 hours of the start of the daily working time; it is important to note that the rules of announcing annual paid leave/ vacation did not change and must be notified 15 days in advance;

b) employer may unilaterally order home office/ remote work for the employees;

c) the employer may implement the necessary and justified measures to check employees’ health status. The Government Decree does not specify the measures necessary and justified, therefore the employers must consider this for themselves, in compliance with the data protection legislation and the HDPA’s legal opinion, as the application of the GDPR has not been suspended for the duration of the state of emergency. It mainly relate to the mostly popular planned fever measure which may only be applied with the restrictions provided by the HDPA.

Collective agreement provisions deviating from the above may not be applied for the duration of the state of emergency, which also means that in any other question the Collective Agreement is applicable.

2. Derogations to be applied by the separate agreement of the parties:
The Government Decree fully extends the possibility of separate agreement between the employer and the employee, which may derogate from the provisions of the Labour Code. It may only be interpreted – although there is no express provision – that it allows the employers to agree with the employees on conditions that are detrimental to the employees – while earlier the Labour Code only allowed deviation in favour of the employees. In that way, thus allowing the establishment of specific and flexible rules for the duration of the state of emergency.

3. The right approach would be if before conclusion of the separate agreement with employees in matters are beyond the above cases and regulated in the Collective Bargains, the employers consult with the Trade Union and the Works’ council if the planned deviations will affect the bigger group of the employees.

The economic measures of the Government in relation to the coronavirus epidemic

On 18 March 2020 the prime minister has announced exceptional economic measures to reduce the impact of the coronavirus epidemic.

According to these measures, in the following sectors the employers shall not pay contributions after their employees, and the contributions of their employees are also significantly reduced (they shall not pay pension contribution, and health insurance contribution is reduced to the minimum set by law) until 30 June 2020:

• tourism
• hospitality ( gastronomy, hotels etc.,)
• entertainment
• sport
• cultural services
• passenger transport

In the above sectors, lease agreements may not be terminated and the amount of rent cannot be raised during this period.

Taxi drivers under ‘small enterperneurs” tax payers are exempted from tax payment.

The tourism sector is also exempted from paying the tourism development contribution.

The Government Decree foresees further legislative changes. We are monitoring for further possible government measures continuously.

The purpose of the publications announced on our website is to provide a brief, concise information on certain issues. The content of this website and the publications is not exhaustive and does not constitute a legal advice. Should you have any specific questions or inquires regarding any issues investigated by our publications, please contact us and we will be happy to be at your disposal.

Derogations in the application of Labour Code for the duration of state of emergency Read More »

The End of The Year From HR Perspective

The end of the year is coming up fast and there are plenty tasks to arrange at the HR Departments. Among the others, it should be checked whether the holiday due for this year have been scheduled for all employees until 31 December, as well as, if the holiday agreements have been signed for 2020. Before entry into 2020, we wish to provide you with quick to do list and also to call your attention to the latest news and the expected relevant changes.
I. Unused holiday

The question of unused holiday at the end of the year is always a cardinal issue from HR view. Therefore, it is advisable to check if each employee how the annual leaves of the current year stands. Unused leave cannot be redeemed in cash, unless the employment relationship is terminated. Leave must therefore be scheduled even if the employee does not wish to take it.

The general rule is that leave due for 2019 cannot be transferred to 2020. Therefore, the remaining holiday shall be scheduled basically for the year of 2019. However in some exceptional cases it may be transferred to the next year, as follows:

·        If employment relationship began on or after 1 October 2019, holiday may be scheduled until 31 March 2020.

·        If, due to a cause at the employee’s side, holiday could not be scheduled in 2019 (e.g. illness, maternity leave, work incapacity, etc.), it can be scheduled within sixty days of the cause ceases to exist.

·        Leave which commences in the due year and does not exceed five working days in the following year shall be deemed to have been taken in the due year.

·        The additional leave due to the age of the employee may be scheduled until 31 December 2020, if the parties concluded an agreement on it in 2019.

·        In the event of economic reasons of particular importance or any direct and consequential reason arising in connection with its operations, the employer may allocate one-fourth of the employee’s holiday by 31 March of the following year if it is stipulated so in the collective agreement.

II. The case of extraordinary work (overtime)

Considering that extraordinary work has an annual limit, it is highly advisable to check how the company stands in this regard as we approach the end of the year.

In the case of full-time work, up to 250 hours of overtime per calendar year can be ordered.

Collective agreement allows 300 hours per year. Further, the employer and the employee may conclude an agreement on additional working hours so that it must not exceed 400 hours overtime per calendar years. This agreement may be terminated by the employee by the end of the calendar year.

However, the above mentioned annual limit shall apply proportionately if the employment relationship began during the year, for a fixed period or for part-time work. It is important that if the company exceeds the annual extraordinary working time limit, it may face serious fines as a result of any labour inspections.

III. Minimum wage and guaranteed wage minimum

As of January, the minimum wage will be expectedly increased again. In 2018, a two-year agreement was made at the meeting of the Competitive Sector and Government Permanent Consultation Forum to increase the minimum wage and the guaranteed wage minimum with 8%-8 % in 2019 and 2020. Thus, the minimum wage could rise to HUF 161,000 in 2020 and the guaranteed wage minimum to HUF 210,600.

The minimum wage and guaranteed wage minimum shall be published by a government decree which has not been issued yet, but it will be expectedly published until the end of the year.

After the decree has been published, the salaries shall be reviewed and the employment contracts shall be amended accordingly.

IV. Social contributions in 2020

With changes of social contribution there is nothing to do, however from payroll perspective it is good to know that according to the bill No. T/8021 from 1st July 2020 (i) pension contributions, (ii) in-kind and (iii) financial health insurance contributions, and (iv) labour market contributions will expectedly merge so called “social security contribution”. However, the rate remains the same, so in total 18.5%.

V. Working time schedule for the year of 2020

The minister of finance has the right to reschedule the working and rest days around the public holidays which changes shall apply in case of employees working under a fix, general working time schedule.

According to the decree of the minister of finance in the next year 21 August (Friday) and the 24 December 2020 (Thursday) shall be rest days, and the 29 August and the 12 December (Saturdays) 2020 are qualified as working days.

VI. Retirement age in 2020

According to Act LXXXI of 1997 employees were born in 1956 may be entitled to old-age pension when they reach the age of 64 plus 183 days. Therefore, the above mentioned employees will be eligible for pension in 2020.

It is remained unchanged that the employee’s employment shall not be terminated due to the retirement.

The End of The Year From HR Perspective Read More »

GDPR „OMNIBUS” Act overwrites the usual HR process

On 26 April 2019, Hungary’s new ‘Omnibus Act’ implementing provisions of the GDPR took effect. This article examines its significant impact on employers and the continuing uncertainty surrounding some of the changes it introduces.

Only a few months ago, employers were required to readjust their processes in preparation for GDPR implementation and now the new so-called ‘Omnibus’ act that amends the Labour Code, among other changes has entered into force (on 26 April 2019). The new regulation requires immediate and very significant work from HR departments, while there are several open issues to be jointly interpreted by labour lawyers together with HR and data protection professionals on how to ensure their daily practice is compliant with the new but ambiguous regulations.

The bottleneck is a result of the fact that Hungarian lawmakers were well behind schedule with implementation of GDPR, leaving employers only a few days to review the new processes, since all employers must comply with all requirements from day one. There is a strong hope that (as has happened in several previous cases) the Omnibus Act will very shortly be corrected by a new amendment.

The GDPR ‘Omnibus’ Act amends 86 acts including the Labour Code in order to comply with GDPR regulations.

This amendment requires the review of labour contracts, HR processes and significant HR policies such as recruitment, selection, new employees’ induction process, operations, the data management of access control systems and use of employer’s devices, just to mention the most common areas concerned.

Employers and all organisations should have complied with the new regulations within a couple of days of entry into force.

Although the new requirements contain more details than the published draft bill, there are still several open issues on how to implement them in practice. For example what is the meaning of, and what are the criteria for the necessity and proportionality test contained in the new regulations in relation to limitations on employees’ personal human rights (in connection with e-mail, internet, device or video surveillance, etc.)? The GDPR only includes the privacy impact assessment and the ‘balancing test’ for ‘legitimate interest’.

The usual process of recording a new employee’s data is basically overridden by the new rule that the employer may only request presentation of an ID card and other personal documents, but no copies can be made, even with the consent of the employee. This will mean that proper identification of the employee would be difficult. The provision of false data by the employee may result in annulment of employment, but with a lack of proper evidence and documentation, the employer may not be in a position to act.

Handling of criminal data records is more strictly regulated, and in the future the basic rule is that no criminal record clearance may be requested from employees. Exceptional and very strict criteria are set for cases when the employer may require an employee to present criminal record clearance, but the precise criteria can be decided by the employer if a serious business risk for the organisation would arise from an employee with undisclosed criminal record working for it.

Finally, the amendment relating to data managed by the biometric access control systems (digital fingerprint, iris/retina scanning, face identification systems), and also the use of the employers’ devices is based on new principles, meaning that a review of internal policies relating to these issues must be conducted.

GDPR „OMNIBUS” Act overwrites the usual HR process Read More »

Amendments with regard to the GDPR has been published

The amendments with regards to the GDPR, which was adopted by the Hungarian Parliament on the 1st of April, was officially published today.

In order to harmonize with the GDPR, the amendments modifies over 80 sectorial law, including provisions of the Labour Code.

The majority of the amendments will come into effect at the end of April, but the modifications regarding the national accreditation and the protection of inventions by patents will come into force in May.

Amendments with regard to the GDPR has been published Read More »

Opportunities created by the “overtime act” put into practice

Amending Act CXVI of 2018 on the organization of working time and the minimum fee of labor leasing activity (hereinafter: amendment) has been announced on 20 December 2018 and entered into force on 1 January 2019.

In our article we are looking for answers to the following questions; what opportunities the change has actually created for employers and which employers can take advantage of the opportunities created by the change.
The amendment essentially concerns issues related to the organization of working time, in particular the rules on working time banking and overtime.

The new opportunities provided by working time banking are only open for employers with collective agreements, while the opportunities in the area of overtime may be used by employers without collective agreements as well, as follows:

I. Options based on collective agreement

According to the amendment as from 1 January 2019, a maximum of 36 months of working time banking may be introduced on the basis of a collective agreement instead of a maximum of one year. In practice, this means that employers wishing to apply a longer working time frame, an amendment must be initiated to the collective agreement currently in force or; in the absence of a collective agreement in force, a collective agreement must be concluded with the trade union authorized to conclude the collective agreement, including that option.

It is important to note that not only 36 months, but shorter, e.g. a 24-month working time frame may also be included in a collective agreement by the parties.

There is a statutory limit to the extremes of work schedules arrangement within the longer working time banking – in addition to the rules on rest days/rest periods – that the 48 hours a week should be at most an annual average (and not, for example, the average of the three years).

For the time being, it is disputed whether the working time banking of more than one year is harmonized with the rules of Directive 2003/88/EC on certain aspects of the organization of working time. Article 19 of that directive provides that a ‘reference period’ for the calculation of working time or rest periods in a collective agreement may not exceed 12 months.

II. Options based on individual agreements with employees

The annual number of overtime hours can be increased up to 400 hours based on an individual agreement with employees. This option is therefore open to employers which do not have a collective agreement/ do not have a trade union with authorized to conclude a collective agreement.

400 hours is the absolute upper limit for overtime work. Higher amounts cannot validly be stipulated in a collective agreement either.

The employee may terminate the agreement by the end of the calendar year. Termination of the agreement shall not be a reason for termination of employment.

III. Options based on the request of the employee

According to the amendment, overtime (supplement payment) is not generated in situations where the employees themselves request the modification of the working time schedule in advance within 96 hours.

This provision recognizes situations that actually occur in practice, when for example the employee asks for a change in the working time schedule for some kind of personal reasons, e.g. “exchange” a workday with another colleague.

It is important that the initiative really comes from the employee. Using employee’s requests for employers’ interests are abusive, thus illegal.

In relation to the option described above it is also important to take into account the general principle of labor law, that working schedule arrangements, overtime arrangements are possible only if the requirements of healthy and safe work are met. In addition to the economic benefits associated with more flexible working hours, it is important to consider that the employer may be required to pay financial compensation for the damage caused by the workers who are proven overloaded or the accidents and health damage caused to them.

Opportunities created by the “overtime act” put into practice Read More »

CLVPartners
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.